Monday, August 23, 2010

this is one crazy report


“I actually think most people don’t want Google to answer their questions. They want Google to tell them what they should be doing next. […] The thing that makes newspapers so fundamentally fascinating—that serendipity—can be calculated now. We can actually produce it electronically.”
Nick Carr, quoting the above,
I hope Google will also be able to tell me the best candidate to vote for in elections. I find that such a burden.
But Carr doesn’t even mention the oddest part of the WSJ interview:
http://www.iscrapbook.com/forum/member.php?u=1418
http://www.hondaforeman.com/36806-emilya92.html
http://www.studentfilmmakers.com/bb/member.php?u=12016
http://sigma-pi.nexodyne.com/member.php?u=59287
http://www.6zap.com/forums/member.php?u=864
http://allthewine.2.forumer.com/index.php?showuser=3313
http://sclegacy.com/forums/member.php?u=6812
http://papodehomem.com.br/forum/member.php/8187-emilya92

[Schmidt] predicts, apparently seriously, that every young person one day will be entitled automatically to change his or her name on reaching adulthood in order to disown youthful hijinks stored on their friends’ social media sites.
I’ve been thinking about this since Saturday. Here’s my theory: the problem with Google is that Eric Schmidt is creepy. I think he’s a really weird dude. Recall, for example, this comment of Schmidt’s from 2009, regarding Google and privacy: “If you have something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn’t be doing it in the first place.”
The industry is filled with eccentric CEOs — billionaires who, say, wear a wardrobe that consists of nothing but identical black shirts and Levi’s 501 jeans, or , including swords, at their home. But Schmidt doesn’t seem eccentric (or at least not merely so). He seems creepy.
, regarding a talk Schmidt gave in March in Abu Dhabi:
In one of the sharper exchanges of the afternoon, a questioner challenged Schmidt with the fact that Google is collecting a staggering amount of information about who we are, what we’re thinking, and even where we are. “All this information that you have about us: where does it go? Who has access to that?” (Google servers and Google employees, under careful rules, Schmidt said.) “Does that scare everyone in this room?” The questioner asked, to applause. “Would you prefer someone else?” Schmidt shot back – to laughter and even greater applause. “Is there a government that you would prefer to be in charge of this?”
That’s a glib answer, but at least our government answers to its citizens through elections. Schmidt answers to Google shareholders. And who’s to say the government won’t have access, by way of subpoenas, to the information Google — and any other cloud service providers — store about us? Maybe the question isn’t who should hold this information, but rather should anyone hold this information.
More and more, I get the feeling that if there’s a rift between the old “Don’t be evil” Google and the new “Let’s do whatever we want” Google, that it’s a rift between Schmidt and Larry/Sergey — if not personally, then at least culturally within the company. On the one side, the Larry/Sergey Google that makes amazing cool things — the search engine, Gmail, Android. On the other, the Schmidt Google that, in its efforts to serve ads as efficiently as possible, no longer seems concerned with the traditional Western concept of personal privacy.
A lot of people seem surprised by Google’s alliance with Verizon on mobile network neutrality. That stance doesn’t fit with my view of the Larry/Sergey Google. But it fits my idea of the Schmidt Google like a glove.
Add starShareShare with noteKeep unreadNot interested

Saturday, August 21, 2010

these are my latest forum joinings

http://www.umfulana.com/forum/member.php?action=profile&uid=1818
http://www.podproducer.net/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=2421
http://www.mysolutionspot.com/ashley56/
http://www.buglabs.net/users/ashley56
http://forums.eyeos.org/index.php?action=profile;u=16720
http://www.la-canada-flintridge-online-community.com/member.php?u=631
http://www.pastapadre.com/forum/member.php?u=5533

Portal on the booklist

This year, for the first time, a video game will appear on the syllabus of a course required for all students at Wabash College, where I teach. For me - and for a traditional liberal arts college founded in 1832 - this is a big deal.
Alongside Gilgamesh, Aristotle's Politics, John Donne's poetry, Shakespeare's Hamlet, and the Tao Te Ching, freshmen at Wabash will also encounter a video game called Portal. If you're curious to know how it happened, read on.
http://www.umfulana.com/forum/member.php?action=profile&uid=1818
http://www.podproducer.net/forum/index.php?action=profile;u=2421
http://www.mysolutionspot.com/ashley56/
http://www.buglabs.net/users/ashley56
http://forums.eyeos.org/index.php?action=profile;u=16720
http://www.la-canada-flintridge-online-community.com/member.php?u=631
http://www.pastapadre.com/forum/member.php?u=5533
Last spring Wabash faculty approved a new all-college course and charged a small committee to design it over the following summer and fall semester. I was elected to the committee as a representative of the Humanities.
We titled the new course "Enduring Questions," and we agreed on this description:
Enduring Questions is a required freshman seminar offered during the spring semester. It is devoted to engaging students with fundamental questions of humanity from multiple perspectives and fostering a sense of community. Each section of the course includes a small group (approximately 15) of students who consider together classic and contemporary works from multiple disciplines. In so doing, students confront what it means to be human and how we understand ourselves, our relationships, and our world.
The daily activity of the course most often involves discussion, and students complete multiple writing assignments for the course. As such, assessment of student performance emphasizes written and oral expression of ideas.
Students may not withdraw from the course. All students must pass the course to graduate from Wabash.
Our charge from the faculty made it clear that we should apply a broad definition to "readings," and I believe my special purpose on the committee was to help identify films, music, art, and other 'non-textual' sources to challenge our students to think hard about the questions raised in the course.
And so, as you might expect, a little light went off in my head. What about a game? Why not? Which one? Will they bite on this? Who knows? Let's try.
My very first thought was Portal. Accessible, smart, cross-platform, relatively short, full of big ideas worth exploring. I played it again to be sure my impressions still held. No problem there. If anything, I admire the game more now than when it first appeared. A beautiful design.
I recalled reading Daniel Johnson's recent essay on the game and its strong connections to Erving Goffman's seminal Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. One of the central questions of our new course, "Who am I?" is the focus of Goffman's study. He contends we strive to control how we're perceived by others, and he uses the metaphor of an actor performing on a stage to illustrate his ideas. Johnson describes it this way:
…we're acting out a role that requires constant management…of the interaction. The front stage is the grounds of the performance. The backstage is a place we rarely ever want to reveal to others, it contains the truth of our obstruction and to reveal it would be to defraud our identity in front of the audience - it simply spoils the illusion of where we're placing ourself in the interaction.
This tension between backstage machination and onstage performance is precisely what Portal depicts so perfectly - and, no small detail, so interactively. Goffman would have found a perfect test subject in GLaDOS. Bingo! Assign students Goffman's Presentation of Self and follow it up with a collective playthrough of Portal.
I pitched the idea to my colleagues on the committee (decidedly not a collection of gamers), and they agreed to try Portal and read selections from Goffman's book. After plowing through some installation issues ("What does this Steam do? Will it expose me to viruses?"), we enjoyed the first meaningful discussion about a video game I've ever had with a group of colleagues across disciplines. They got it. They made the connections, and they enjoyed the game. Most importantly, they saw how Portal could provoke thoughtful reflection and vigorous conversation on questions germain to the course.
And so we're playing Portal at Wabash College.
Could I have chosen a game to stand by itself, with no accompanying text assignment? Maybe. I thought about Bioshock. I thought about Planescape: Torment. In the end, I chose Portal because I thought it would make a good start. A good first impression. A lead-off hitter, if you will.
Deploying a game for an entire cohort to play at the same time requires more problem-solving than you might expect. We ultimately decided that hardware, installation, and licensing issues were complex enough to dissuade us from teaching Portal in all sections of the course this year; so I and a group of eager colleagues will play the game in our sections to work out the kinks. I don't want our first college-wide experience with a game to be plagued with problems.
I also need time to help acclimate some of my colleagues to "reading" a modern game. They're less resistant than you might think, but they need more than my speechifying. They need sound pedagogy. They need to taste it for themselves. We'll get there. I'll let you know how it goes.
Add starShareShare with noteKeep unreadNot interested

A Look at Burger King's Latest Whopper Bar in NYC and Their New Pizza Burgers

Sent to you by Rio via Google Reader: A Look at Burger King's Latest
Whopper Bar in NYC and Their New Pizza Burgers via Slice on 8/18/10

From A Hamburger Today

VIEW SLIDESHOW: A Look at Burger King's Latest Whopper Bar in NYC and
Their New Pizza Burgers

After Burger King's successful debut of their modernized
Whopper-centric restaurant concept Whopper Bar last March at Universal
CityWalk in Orlando, they've since opened Whopper Bars in South Beach,
Memphis, Spain, Venezuela, Singapore, and their latest, largest,
two-story flagship location in New York City by Times Square.

Like the other Whopper Bars, the New York City location features
create-your-own Whoppers with over 20 topping choices, a special
Whopper Menu not available at regular Burger Kings, and a more stylish,
roomy environment to eat in. But unlike the other Whopper Bars, there's
this:



The New York Pizza Burger ($12.99), a 9-and-a-half-inch wide burger
made with four Whopper patties topped with pepperoni, mozzarella
cheese, marinara sauce, and Tuscan pesto sauce. It'll be available
exclusively at the New York City Whopper Bar starting in September to
fulfill that longtime desire for a giant burger that sort of tastes
like a pizza.



As Adam is the resident pizza and burger fiend (and just reviewed a
pizza burger, I'll let him review the burger:

I was absolutely starved when Robyn walked into the office with the
Pizza Burger. I hadn't eaten all day. As you know, "Hunger is the best
sauce in the world." So I dove into that thing, nearly knocking down
the gaggle of officemates who had come over to gawk at it. (Yes, it's
looks funny. Like a giant burger wearing a flower costume, each lobe a
petal of beefreakiness.)

Anyway, I housed that thing. But even in my rush to gullet-cram, I was
surprised that it actually managed to convey both burgerness and
pizzaness in a single bite. Of course, when you've got the
assertiveness of that liquid smoke BK flavor mixed with plenty of pizza
shaky spices, it's not too hard to light up the "burger" and "pizza"
areas of the brain at once.

It was interesting as a novelty, which is what BK probably introduced
it for (I mean, look at all the bloggage it's gotten), but I much
prefer the standard Whopper if given a choice among BK menu items.

I can't top Adam's review, so I'll just say...it tastes like a
pizza-flavored Whopper.

During my press visit to the Whopper Bar I also tried the Meat Beast
Whopper ($5.54) topped with bacon, pepperoni, mayo, lettuce, tomato,
onions, American cheese, and ketchup, making its debut in New York
City; the 7-ounce BK Black and Bleu Steakhouse XT ($6.30) topped with
blue cheese and blackened Cajun sauce; and the California Whopper
($5.54) topped with guacamole, crispy bacon, and Swiss cheese. Out of
all of these, the California Whopper is the most popular so far at this
location.

Whopper Bar is open 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and will soon
serve beer. Aside from Whoppers they also serve chicken sandwiches,
desserts, and breakfast sandwiches from 5:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m.

For more photos, check out the slideshow.
Whopper Bar
561 7th Avenue, New York, NY 10018 (b/n 40th and 41st; map)
212-997-5122; bk.com

Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to Slice using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your
favorite sites

A bike lane video game on N. Williams

Sent to you by Rio via Google Reader: A bike lane video game on N.
Williams via BikePortland.org » Front Page by Jonathan Maus
(Publisher/Editor) on 8/18/10
Someone has stenciled several video game symbols in the N. Williams
bike lane.
- See the rest of them below -
(Photos © J. Maus)
A cherished local tradition of adding character and personality to our
bike lanes has taken a new twist. Someone has painted symbols from
Nintendo's Mario Kart video game in the bike lanes on N. Williams Ave.

The painted symbols begin south of N Tillamook Avenue with a set of
speed-boosting arrows (see above) and the symbols continue to about N.
Cook Ave. There are several bananas...

A mushroom (which a reader tells me is worth an extra life in the game
allows you to store a speed boost)...

And a star (which gives you invincibility)...

While this sort of vandalism is obviously illegal, I don't think anyone
is looking to crack down on it. Reader Steve R. wrote us to share this
sentiment about the symbols:

"I'm sure this is very illegal. As I pedal home from work, though, I
find it engaging and humorous. Would motorists similarly decorate their
lanes? I suspect not - this good-natured vandalism is a sign that
bikers take pride in their bike lanes and the biking community we've
created. Well, that is my impression anyway."

Have you seen the symbols? What's your impression? I find them to be
great conversation starters with my fellow Williams commuters.



Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to BikePortland.org » Front Page using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your
favorite sites

Friday, August 20, 2010

Is it legal to eat your cat?

Sent to you by Rio via Google Reader: Is it legal to eat your cat? via
Slate Magazine by Brian Palmer on 8/12/10
When police in Western New York pulled over Gary Korkuc for blowing off
a stop sign on Sunday, they found a live cat in his trunk, covered in
cooking oil, peppers, and salt. Korkuc told authorities that his pet
feline was "possessive, greedy, and wasteful" and that he intended to
cook and eat it. Korkuc has been charged with animal cruelty. Is there
a legal way to cook and eat a cat?

[more ...]



Cat - Cruelty to animals - Police - Gary Korkuc - Cooking
Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to Slate Magazine using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your
favorite sites